Digital Property Rights with Bitmark NFTs — Evolving The Artist’s Reserved Rights Transfer and Sale Agreement
By Michael Nguyễn (Head of Operations, Bitmark) and Sean Moss-Pultz (CEO, Bitmark)
Bitmark was founded in 2014 to make tools for individuals to control their own data. They have worked across essential services such as public health, life sciences, entertainment, and digital identity.
At Bitmark, we believe that agreements around digital property (data, artwork, collectibles) cannot be resolved purely through traditional legal contracts or technology-based smart contracts. Legal contracts can’t handle the fidelity of digital assets (such as defining and enforcing the boundaries of digital property) at scale, technology-based smart contracts can’t handle the incomplete nature of contracts. No contract, and thus no software code, no matter how well constructed, can account for every possible contingency. The DAO) highlighted this issue on the Ethereum blockchain several years ago.
This is why Bitmark NFTs combine the best of software code (technology) and property law to create robust agreements for all stakeholders. For example, Feral File, the Bitmark-secured NFT art marketplace, builds upon the pioneering 1971 legal agreement "The Artist’s Reserved Rights Transfer and Sale Agreement". Feral File’s "Artist + Collector Rights" evolves that agreement for the digital age. It uses the blockchain to record each edition and transfer of ownership.
Here’s how Bitmark’s code and the law work together:
- A blockchain record (Bitmark NFT) defines and connects rights to an asset. This is similar to a “bundle of rights” from traditional property law.
- Each edition from Feral File contains a unique agreement, digitally signed by the collector and the artist. This agreement is hashed along with the artwork itself to form a unique identifier that is recorded in the Bitmark Blockchain.
- Secondary sales are also standardized in the agreement. This allows artists to take part in the value created when their work appreciates.
Our hypothesis is that by cryptographically linking artworks with their legal agreements, we can establish a more sustainable and transparent market for digital artworks. The Bitmark blockchain was purpose-built to process the rights around digital assets at scale. It is more energy efficient, less expensive, and faster at these transactions than other solutions while remaining decentralized, secure, and censorship resistant. Learn more about how ERC-721 compares to Bitmark here.
